Triple
T6142389
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Montgomery County, Alabama |
E136991
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Waugh, Alabama |
E284947
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Waugh, Alabama | Statement: [Montgomery County, Alabama, contains, Waugh, Alabama]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Waugh, Alabama Context triple: [Montgomery County, Alabama, contains, Waugh, Alabama]
-
A.
Waugh, Alabama
chosen
Waugh, Alabama is an unincorporated community in Montgomery County known for its rural character and location along U.S. Route 80 east of Montgomery.
-
B.
Grant, Alabama
Grant, Alabama is a small town in Marshall County known as the closest community to Cathedral Caverns State Park in the Appalachian region of northern Alabama.
-
C.
Waverly, Alabama
Waverly, Alabama is a small rural town in eastern Alabama known for its tight-knit community and historic Southern character.
-
D.
Ragland, Alabama
Ragland, Alabama is a small town in central Alabama known for its rural character and location within the Birmingham–Hoover metropolitan area.
-
E.
Weogufka, Alabama
Weogufka, Alabama is a small unincorporated rural community located in Coosa County in the central part of the state.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008a2c6308190a56519b22d55d083 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c05cb387ac8190a60579b59a741425 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:18 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c20d67cac0819088802d5a21654fe8 |
completed | March 24, 2026, 4:04 a.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:16 p.m.