Triple
T6137379
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Susan Moore, Alabama |
E136867
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasName |
P744
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Susan Moore |
E538508
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Susan Moore | Statement: [Susan Moore, Alabama, hasName, Susan Moore]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Susan Moore Context triple: [Susan Moore, Alabama, hasName, Susan Moore]
-
A.
Susan Moore
chosen
Susan Moore is a fictional character portrayed by actress Lauren Hutton in the film "Welcome to L.A."
-
B.
Rachel Moore
Rachel Moore is a common personal name shared by multiple individuals, including figures in fields such as the arts, academia, and entertainment.
-
C.
Michelle Stevens
Michelle Stevens is a relatively common personal name that may refer to multiple individuals across different fields, rather than a single widely recognized public figure.
-
D.
Mary Barnes
Mary Barnes is known primarily as the wife of prominent American modernist architect Edward Larrabee Barnes.
-
E.
Laura Bonham Carter
Laura Bonham Carter was a British Liberal political figure and member of the prominent Bonham Carter family, known for her marriage to Liberal Party leader Jo Grimond.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008a179388190a3b5a081bbf46d55 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c05c83aefc8190b0e250e96f2b10b4 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:17 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c16ece259c8190b7258859a35ca4fd |
completed | March 23, 2026, 4:48 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:15 p.m.