Triple

T613406
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sugar Bowl E12148 entity
Predicate traditionalConferenceTieIn P17120 FINISHED
Object SEC champion LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: SEC champion | Statement: [Sugar Bowl, traditionalConferenceTieIn, SEC champion]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: traditionalConferenceTieIn
Context triple: [Sugar Bowl, traditionalConferenceTieIn, SEC champion]
  • A. conferenceType
    Indicates the specific category or kind of conference associated with an entity (e.g., workshop, symposium, seminar).
  • B. conferenceAtTheTime
    Indicates that an event or situation occurs during the time period in which a specified conference is taking place.
  • C. conference1
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with, participates in, or is characterized as a specific conference event or instance.
  • D. conferenceAlignment
    Indicates how closely a conference’s themes, goals, or content correspond to a particular standard, interest, or strategic objective.
  • E. otherConference
    Indicates that one conference is distinct from and not the same as another conference.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493309df48190a327f748e88049a6 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49e08dbf88190ab050078a63e266b completed March 1, 2026, 8:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a49cfbcbf88190a854921dc531eba8 completed March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a49def31ec81909dc53e70f4a36eda completed March 1, 2026, 8:13 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:35 p.m.