Triple

T6124244
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject William Calley E136555 entity
Predicate statedDefense P36520 FINISHED
Object claimed he was following orders LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: claimed he was following orders | Statement: [William Calley, statedDefense, claimed he was following orders]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statedDefense
Context triple: [William Calley, statedDefense, claimed he was following orders]
  • A. defendedAs
    Indicates that one entity is presented, argued, or justified as being equivalent to or serving the role of another entity in a defensive or protective context.
  • B. defends
    Indicates that one entity protects or supports another entity against attack, criticism, or harm.
  • C. defenseArgument chosen
    Indicates that an entity presents or supports a line of reasoning intended to defend or justify another entity, often in a legal or argumentative context.
  • D. typeOfDefense
    Indicates the specific kind or category of defense employed or possessed in a given context.
  • E. defenderIn
    Indicates that an entity serves as a defensive agent or protector within a specified context, situation, or domain.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0089f851c81909e5e189a617dcff6 completed March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c05c25976081909e0a40e07dff0b8a completed March 22, 2026, 9:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c049f9ab3c81909c8ab6466f6a2935 completed March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:14 p.m.