Triple
T60963
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bush v. Gore |
E1210
|
entity |
| Predicate | precedentStatus |
P3138
|
FINISHED |
| Object | binding precedent on federal equal protection analysis of recount procedures |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: binding precedent on federal equal protection analysis of recount procedures | Statement: [Bush v. Gore, precedentStatus, binding precedent on federal equal protection analysis of recount procedures]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: precedentStatus Context triple: [Bush v. Gore, precedentStatus, binding precedent on federal equal protection analysis of recount procedures]
-
A.
precedentFor
chosen
Indicates that one situation, decision, or case serves as an authoritative example or basis for deciding or interpreting another.
-
B.
confersPrecedenceIn
Indicates that one entity is granted higher priority, rank, or standing over another within a specified context or domain.
-
C.
status
Indicates the current condition, state, or standing of an entity within a given context.
-
D.
predecessor
Indicates that one entity comes before another in an ordered sequence or succession.
-
E.
hasLegalProceeding
Indicates that there is a formal legal action, case, or proceeding involving the related entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24ba4f760819081f6638a3c70538a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a251a1b8ac8190b44be4c3c41e5681 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ea0bec48190b2af1fb287e9e692 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:10 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:02 a.m.