Triple
T60944
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bush v. Gore |
E1210
|
entity |
| Predicate | majorityVote |
P4520
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 7–2 on the Equal Protection violation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 7–2 on the Equal Protection violation | Statement: [Bush v. Gore, majorityVote, 7–2 on the Equal Protection violation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: majorityVote Context triple: [Bush v. Gore, majorityVote, 7–2 on the Equal Protection violation]
-
A.
unanimousDecision
Indicates that all relevant participants fully agree on a decision without any dissent.
-
B.
votingMethod
Indicates the procedure or system by which a vote is cast, collected, and counted in a decision-making or electoral process.
-
C.
popularVoteWinner
Indicates that the subject is the candidate who received the highest number of individual votes cast by the electorate in an election.
-
D.
hasMajorityLeader
Indicates that one entity serves as the primary or leading decision-making authority (majority leader) for another entity, typically within a governing or organizational body.
-
E.
electionMethod
Indicates the process or system used to select a candidate or make a decision in an election.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24ba4f760819081f6638a3c70538a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a251a1b8ac8190b44be4c3c41e5681 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ea0bec48190b2af1fb287e9e692 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:10 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a251a088f8819083797c2baf310c39 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:23 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:02 a.m.