Triple
T60922
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Roe v. Wade |
E1209
|
entity |
| Predicate | isCitedAsPrecedentFor |
P3138
|
FINISHED |
| Object | constitutional protection of certain privacy-related decisions prior to 2022 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: constitutional protection of certain privacy-related decisions prior to 2022 | Statement: [Roe v. Wade, isCitedAsPrecedentFor, constitutional protection of certain privacy-related decisions prior to 2022]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isCitedAsPrecedentFor Context triple: [Roe v. Wade, isCitedAsPrecedentFor, constitutional protection of certain privacy-related decisions prior to 2022]
-
A.
precedentFor
chosen
Indicates that one situation, decision, or case serves as an authoritative example or basis for deciding or interpreting another.
-
B.
constitutionalCitation
Indicates a relationship where one entity cites, references, or is grounded in a specific provision or article of a constitution.
-
C.
confersPrecedenceIn
Indicates that one entity is granted higher priority, rank, or standing over another within a specified context or domain.
-
D.
appealsFrom
Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling is being challenged and taken to a higher authority or court for review.
-
E.
notableSupremeCourtCase
Indicates that a legal case is recognized as a significant or influential decision by the Supreme Court.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24ba4f760819081f6638a3c70538a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a251a1b8ac8190b44be4c3c41e5681 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ea0bec48190b2af1fb287e9e692 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:10 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:02 a.m.