Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Bolling v. Sharpe (argued separately, decided same day) | Statement: [Brown v. Board of Education, consolidatedFrom, Bolling v. Sharpe (argued separately, decided same day)]

Target entity: Bolling v. Sharpe (argued separately, decided same day)
Context triple: [Brown v. Board of Education, consolidatedFrom, Bolling v. Sharpe (argued separately, decided same day)]

• A. Reynolds v. United States
  Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
• B. United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion
  The United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion is a landmark Supreme Court decision, authored by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, that struck down the Virginia Military Institute’s male-only admissions policy as unconstitutional sex discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause.
• C. Hines v. Davidowitz
  Hines v. Davidowitz is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal law preempts conflicting state alien-registration laws under the Supremacy Clause.
• D. Marbury v. Madison
  Marbury v. Madison is the landmark 1803 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review, empowering federal courts to strike down laws that violate the Constitution.
• E. Obergefell v. Hodges
  Obergefell v. Hodges is the landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide by ruling that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Bolling v. Sharpe (argued separately, decided same day)
Triple: [Brown v. Board of Education, consolidatedFrom, Bolling v. Sharpe (argued separately, decided same day)]

Bolling v. Sharpe (argued separately, decided same day) is a landmark 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

Target entity: Bolling v. Sharpe (argued separately, decided same day)
Target entity description: Bolling v. Sharpe (argued separately, decided same day) is a landmark 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

• A. Reynolds v. United States
  Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
• B. United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion
  The United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion is a landmark Supreme Court decision, authored by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, that struck down the Virginia Military Institute’s male-only admissions policy as unconstitutional sex discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause.
• C. Hines v. Davidowitz
  Hines v. Davidowitz is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal law preempts conflicting state alien-registration laws under the Supremacy Clause.
• D. Marbury v. Madison
  Marbury v. Madison is the landmark 1803 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review, empowering federal courts to strike down laws that violate the Constitution.
• E. Obergefell v. Hodges
  Obergefell v. Hodges is the landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide by ruling that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry.
• F. None of above. chosen