Triple

T6057702
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject In the Dark E134955 entity
Predicate hasReviewScore P59739 FINISHED
Object generally positive critical reception LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: generally positive critical reception | Statement: [In the Dark, hasReviewScore, generally positive critical reception]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasReviewScore
Context triple: [In the Dark, hasReviewScore, generally positive critical reception]
  • A. hasRecension
    Indicates that one textual version or edition is a revised or alternative form of another text.
  • B. hasReviewBody
    Indicates that an entity has an associated textual review content or body describing an evaluation or opinion about it.
  • C. hasRatingLevel chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular rating level or score category.
  • D. hasReviewReception
    Indicates that an entity has received a critical or evaluative review describing how it was received or perceived.
  • E. areReviewedEvery
    Indicates that one entity conducts reviews of another entity at every specified time interval or on every relevant occasion.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c00877b6d4819096b0e163728b73a3 completed March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c0570d00e88190b2d8d596e40378d9 completed March 22, 2026, 8:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c049edc6f0819092ca620d9073ad26 completed March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:09 p.m.