Triple

T6033660
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Office Open XML (ECMA-376) E134365 entity
Predicate macroEnabledExtensionsInclude P68871 FINISHED
Object .docm LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: .docm | Statement: [Office Open XML (ECMA-376), macroEnabledExtensionsInclude, .docm]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: macroEnabledExtensionsInclude
Context triple: [Office Open XML (ECMA-376), macroEnabledExtensionsInclude, .docm]
  • A. supportsExtensionsFrom
    Indicates that one entity is capable of recognizing, loading, or interoperating with extensions originating from another entity.
  • B. supportsTemplateEnginesViaExtensions
    Indicates that something provides compatibility with template engines through the use of extensions.
  • C. hasExtensionsDirectory
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or configured to use a specific directory where its extensions or add-ons are stored.
  • D. hasExtensionBy
    Indicates that one entity is extended, augmented, or further developed by another entity.
  • E. formerExtension
    Indicates that one entity previously served as an extension or subsidiary part of another entity, but no longer holds that status.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0087515148190a97475d412563865 completed March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c056b220608190b156be95632cf3b3 completed March 22, 2026, 8:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c049e9a68c81909da0cfe4779ce9b5 completed March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c04e8c5bfc8190b986a7071d1b23e3 completed March 22, 2026, 8:18 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:08 p.m.