Triple
T6015618
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Southern Transdanubia |
E133942
|
entity |
| Predicate | largestCity |
P235
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pécs |
E38480
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pécs | Statement: [Southern Transdanubia, largestCity, Pécs]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pécs Context triple: [Southern Transdanubia, largestCity, Pécs]
-
A.
Pécs
chosen
Pécs is a historic cultural and university city in southwestern Hungary, renowned for its Roman and Ottoman heritage and its designation as a European Capital of Culture in 2010.
-
B.
Kaposvár
Kaposvár is a city in southwestern Hungary that serves as the administrative and cultural center of Somogy County.
-
C.
Győr
Győr is a historic city in northwestern Hungary, known as an important regional cultural and economic center at the confluence of the Danube, Rába, and Rábca rivers.
-
D.
Veszprém
Veszprém is a historic city in western Hungary known for its medieval castle district and role as a regional cultural and administrative center.
-
E.
Siófok
Siófok is a popular resort town on the southern shore of Lake Balaton in Hungary, known for its beaches and vibrant summer tourism.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0087361a48190905c6b55969852b8 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c04f80ec108190ae9711727debb061 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:22 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c518c29dfc8190a55a54fbe6608dd2 |
completed | March 26, 2026, 11:30 a.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:06 p.m.