Triple
T6001222
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1960 AFL Championship |
E133599
|
entity |
| Predicate | visitorTeamRecordEnteringGame |
P44539
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 10–4 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 10–4 | Statement: [1960 AFL Championship, visitorTeamRecordEnteringGame, 10–4]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: visitorTeamRecordEnteringGame Context triple: [1960 AFL Championship, visitorTeamRecordEnteringGame, 10–4]
-
A.
visitingTeamRecordEnteringGame
chosen
Indicates the performance record (such as wins and losses) that the visiting team has accumulated prior to the start of the game.
-
B.
ramsRecordEnteringGame
Indicates the performance record (such as wins and losses) that the Rams team holds at the time they enter a particular game.
-
C.
homeTeamRecordEnteringGame
Indicates the win-loss (and possibly tie) record that the home team had prior to the start of the game.
-
D.
losingTeamRecordEnteringGame
Indicates that the team’s win-loss record prior to the game was a losing record (more losses than wins) entering that specific game.
-
E.
winningTeamLeagueRecordEnteringGame
Indicates the win-loss (and possibly tie) record that the winning team had in its league before the game was played.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00872444c8190bfaf1739dcec765c |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c04ee7c0e08190a6e78969448b070a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c049e152e88190979ab80cb9b50321 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:05 p.m.