Triple
T6000642
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Best a Man Can Get |
E133585
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWithProductCategory |
P62838
|
FINISHED |
| Object | razors |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: razors | Statement: [The Best a Man Can Get, associatedWithProductCategory, razors]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithProductCategory Context triple: [The Best a Man Can Get, associatedWithProductCategory, razors]
-
A.
associatedBrandCategory
Indicates that a brand is linked to or classified under a particular product or service category.
-
B.
hasRelatedCategory
Indicates that one category is associated with another category through a non-hierarchical, contextually relevant relationship.
-
C.
relatedToProduct
chosen
Indicates a general association or connection between an entity and a specific product, without specifying the exact nature of that relationship.
-
D.
isAssociatedWith
Indicates that there exists a connection, relationship, or involvement between two entities without specifying its exact nature.
-
E.
hasCategoryOn
Indicates that something is assigned to or associated with a specific category within a given context or scope.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00872444c8190bfaf1739dcec765c |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c04ee5e7bc8190aaa87605fa7b102e |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c049e152e88190979ab80cb9b50321 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:05 p.m.