Triple
T5988482
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Robert Sobukwe |
E133284
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalRestriction |
P39734
|
FINISHED |
| Object | detained under the Sobukwe Clause |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: detained under the Sobukwe Clause | Statement: [Robert Sobukwe, legalRestriction, detained under the Sobukwe Clause]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalRestriction Context triple: [Robert Sobukwe, legalRestriction, detained under the Sobukwe Clause]
-
A.
legalConstraint
chosen
Indicates that one entity imposes or is subject to a rule, restriction, or requirement defined by a legal or regulatory framework in relation to another entity or action.
-
B.
formerLegalRestriction
Indicates that a legal restriction once applied to an entity or relationship but is no longer in effect.
-
C.
legalRequirement
Indicates that one entity is obligated by law to perform, provide, or comply with something in relation to another entity or situation.
-
D.
notableRestriction
Indicates that there is a significant limitation, constraint, or prohibition that meaningfully affects the entity or its use.
-
E.
legalAct
Indicates that an entity performs, enacts, or is involved in a formal legal action, measure, or proceeding under a legal framework.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0087010d081908bb8142342d63330 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c04dc51d948190bacf4c40a73e91b2 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c049de98648190962b14fd341c93da |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:04 p.m.