Triple

T59882
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Texas Legislature E1186 entity
Predicate numberOfRepresentatives P4273 FINISHED
Object 150 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 150 | Statement: [Texas Legislature, numberOfRepresentatives, 150]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: numberOfRepresentatives
Context triple: [Texas Legislature, numberOfRepresentatives, 150]
  • A. numberOfColoniesRepresented
    Indicates the count of distinct colonies that are represented or involved in relation to a given entity or context.
  • B. hasElectoralRepresentation
    Indicates that one entity is represented in an electoral body or decision-making institution by another entity (such as a representative, party, or delegation).
  • C. hasElectoralVotes
    Indicates that a political entity (such as a state or district) possesses a specified number of votes in an electoral system used to choose an officeholder.
  • D. electoralVotesNeededToWin
    Indicates the minimum number of electoral votes a candidate must obtain in an election to be declared the winner.
  • E. numberOfMemberStates
    Indicates the total count of member states associated with a given entity or organization.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a24a552ef88190a0df287d68c65cba completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:52 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a250e401288190ba12322c9c5f07c9 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24e9f40908190a2f4a2111469b733 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:10 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a250e2a80881909e5a653260e6f8e0 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:55 a.m.