Triple
T597667
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Percy Fawcett |
E11421
|
entity |
| Predicate | allegedStatus |
P16813
|
FINISHED |
| Object | missing person |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: missing person | Statement: [Percy Fawcett, allegedStatus, missing person]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: allegedStatus Context triple: [Percy Fawcett, allegedStatus, missing person]
-
A.
statusDisputedBy
Indicates that the validity, accuracy, or recognition of a status is being challenged or contested by a specified party.
-
B.
accusedOf
Indicates that one entity has formally alleged or claimed that another entity committed a specific wrongdoing or offense.
-
C.
hasLegalStatus
Indicates that an entity possesses a particular legal classification, recognition, or standing under law.
-
D.
legalStatusClarifiedBy
Indicates that the legal status of something is defined, explained, or resolved by a specific document, decision, or authoritative act.
-
E.
statusIndicates
Indicates that a particular status value conveys or reflects the current condition, state, or situation of an entity or process.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4932779b881908688590d59c71900 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a49dc4f7d08190990f70b9b3af6ce5 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a49cf59cd0819084e67981cb371e25 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a49dc0e6a08190b81d82a6f2571c41 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:12 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:35 p.m.