Triple

T597227
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Junior Warden E11412 entity
Predicate electedOrAppointed P11399 FINISHED
Object elected in many jurisdictions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: elected in many jurisdictions | Statement: [Junior Warden, electedOrAppointed, elected in many jurisdictions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: electedOrAppointed
Context triple: [Junior Warden, electedOrAppointed, elected in many jurisdictions]
  • A. appointedOrElected chosen
    Indicates that an entity attained a position, role, or office through either an appointment process or an electoral process.
  • B. electedOffice
    Indicates that an entity holds or has held a particular office or position as a result of an election.
  • C. appointedBy
    Indicates that one entity has been formally selected or assigned to a position, role, or office by another entity.
  • D. appointedByOffice
    Indicates that an entity attains its position or role through a formal appointment made by a specific office or official authority.
  • E. electedWith
    Indicates that one entity attained an elected position or office together with, or as part of the same electoral outcome as, another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4932779b881908688590d59c71900 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49dc4f7d08190990f70b9b3af6ce5 completed March 1, 2026, 8:12 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a49cf59cd0819084e67981cb371e25 completed March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:35 p.m.