Triple
T597127
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sámi |
E11410
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLanguage |
P15
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Southern Sámi |
E73468
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Southern Sámi | Statement: [Sámi, hasLanguage, Southern Sámi]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Southern Sámi Context triple: [Sámi, hasLanguage, Southern Sámi]
-
A.
Sámi
The Sámi are an Indigenous Finno-Ugric people of northern Europe, traditionally known for reindeer herding, fishing, and a distinct cultural and linguistic heritage across parts of Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Russia.
-
B.
Sami languages
chosen
Sami languages are a group of Uralic Indigenous languages spoken by the Sámi people across northern parts of Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Russia.
-
C.
Yugtun
Yugtun is the Central Alaskan Yup’ik language spoken by Yup’ik people in western and southwestern Alaska.
-
D.
Svan language
Svan language is a highly conservative and endangered Kartvelian language spoken by the Svan people in the Svaneti region of northwestern Georgia.
-
E.
Meänkieli
Meänkieli is a Finnic minority language closely related to Finnish, traditionally spoken by the Tornedalian people in northern Sweden.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4932779b881908688590d59c71900 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a49d2b98d08190a1c1e8659efdfd75 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:10 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a5740161cc81909a0086f7c541be98 |
completed | March 2, 2026, 11:26 a.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:35 p.m.