Triple
T5961480
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | John A. Quitman |
E132647
|
entity |
| Predicate | wasSlaveOwner |
P55901
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [John A. Quitman, wasSlaveOwner, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wasSlaveOwner Context triple: [John A. Quitman, wasSlaveOwner, true]
-
A.
wasEnslavedIn
Indicates that an entity was held in a state of slavery within a specified place or context.
-
B.
hasEnslavedCharacter
chosen
Indicates that one entity has held another entity in a state of slavery or forced servitude.
-
C.
wasSlaveDescendant
Indicates that one entity is a descendant of another individual who lived in a condition of slavery.
-
D.
wasFormerlyEnslaved
Indicates that an entity was previously held in a condition of slavery or bondage but is no longer enslaved.
-
E.
numberOfEnslaved
Indicates the quantity of individuals who were held in a state of enslavement in relation to a given entity or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0086c2364819091e9fe2f58fa2517 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c03fb7f8a88190a8bd45208bda4a03 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c0335a635881909c58c1ef0f97f1e8 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:22 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:02 p.m.