Triple
T591216
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sami |
E17274
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Uralic language group |
C3812
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Uralic language group Context triple: [Sami, instanceOf, Uralic language group]
-
A.
Uralic language
chosen
A Uralic language is a member of the Uralic language family, originating in Northern Eurasia and characterized by features such as agglutinative morphology, extensive case systems, and vowel harmony, including languages like Finnish, Hungarian, and Estonian.
-
B.
Finnic language
A Finnic language is a member of the Uralic language family spoken primarily around the Baltic Sea region, including languages such as Finnish, Estonian, and Karelian, characterized by agglutinative morphology and vowel harmony.
-
C.
Paleo-European language
A Paleo-European language is a hypothesized pre-Indo-European language or group of languages once spoken in prehistoric Europe, known primarily through substratum influences, place names, and limited archaeological and linguistic reconstruction.
-
D.
Indo-European language
An Indo-European language is a member of a large family of related languages spoken across Europe and parts of Asia, all descended from a common prehistoric ancestor known as Proto-Indo-European.
-
E.
Turkic language
A Turkic language is a member of a family of closely related languages spoken across a vast area from Eastern Europe and Anatolia through Central Asia to Siberia and Western China, characterized by agglutinative morphology, vowel harmony, and similar grammatical structures.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49379d09c8190ac7e00b24e2810b1 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m.