Triple
T5907629
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Labette County, Kansas |
E131379
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasStream |
P23365
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Labette Creek |
E693679
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Labette Creek | Statement: [Labette County, Kansas, hasStream, Labette Creek]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Labette Creek Context triple: [Labette County, Kansas, hasStream, Labette Creek]
-
A.
Labette Creek
chosen
Labette Creek is a stream in southeastern Kansas whose name was adopted for Labette County.
-
B.
Buttermilk Creek
Buttermilk Creek is a stream in New York whose cascading waters form the prominent waterfalls that give Buttermilk Falls State Park its name.
-
C.
Richland Creek
Richland Creek is a waterway in southern Tennessee that flows through the city of Pulaski and the surrounding Giles County region.
-
D.
Poteau River
The Poteau River is a tributary of the Arkansas River that flows through eastern Oklahoma and western Arkansas, playing a key role in the region’s drainage and local recreation.
-
E.
Well Creek
Well Creek is a waterway associated with the locality of Upwell in England, forming part of the region’s drainage and navigation network.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008593a44819081a07ae0efe6c574 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c03772d9dc8190899fe49ef887e685 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:39 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cdc60b0ae48190bb6e6f38bcbb05dd |
completed | April 2, 2026, 1:27 a.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:59 p.m.