Triple

T5904468
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Florence Trenchard E131307 entity
Predicate hasRomanticStoryline P10693 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Florence Trenchard, hasRomanticStoryline, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRomanticStoryline
Context triple: [Florence Trenchard, hasRomanticStoryline, true]
  • A. hasRomanticTensionWith
    Indicates a mutual or one-sided romantic attraction or unresolved romantic interest existing between two entities.
  • B. hasMarriagePlot
    Indicates that the work’s narrative centrally involves courtship, romantic relationships, or the progression toward marriage as a key plot element.
  • C. romanticArc chosen
    Indicates a developing or ongoing romantic relationship or storyline between the involved entities.
  • D. hasSpouseInStory
    Indicates that one entity is depicted as the spouse of another within the context of a particular story or narrative.
  • E. relationshipStatusDuringFilm
    Indicates the type or state of a relationship between entities specifically during the time period in which a film takes place or is produced.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0085864a88190a569c05ff7d65f29 completed March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c03ee10b308190afe38b904ae7c5f7 completed March 22, 2026, 7:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c0334fcf6481908e8e74105de9d49b completed March 22, 2026, 6:22 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:59 p.m.