Triple

T59019
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Shannon entropy E1168 entity
Predicate invariantUnder P4235 FINISHED
Object relabeling of outcomes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: relabeling of outcomes | Statement: [Shannon entropy, invariantUnder, relabeling of outcomes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: invariantUnder
Context triple: [Shannon entropy, invariantUnder, relabeling of outcomes]
  • A. isSubjectTo
    Indicates that one entity is governed, affected, or constrained by the authority, rules, conditions, or influence of another entity.
  • B. ensures
    Indicates that one entity guarantees or makes certain that a particular condition, outcome, or state holds for another entity or situation.
  • C. implementedUnder
    Indicates that an action, policy, or process is carried out within the scope, authority, or framework defined by a particular higher-level plan, rule, or governing entity.
  • D. perpendicularTo
    Indicates that one entity is oriented at a right angle (90 degrees) to another entity.
  • E. susceptibleTo
    Indicates that one entity is vulnerable or likely to be affected, harmed, or influenced by another entity or factor.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a24a552ef88190a0df287d68c65cba completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:52 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a250e401288190ba12322c9c5f07c9 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24e9f40908190a2f4a2111469b733 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:10 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a250e2a80881909e5a653260e6f8e0 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:55 a.m.