Triple
T5895345
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | MPL 2.0 |
E131086
|
entity |
| Predicate | patentGrant |
P49345
|
FINISHED |
| Object | explicit patent license from contributors |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: explicit patent license from contributors | Statement: [MPL 2.0, patentGrant, explicit patent license from contributors]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: patentGrant Context triple: [MPL 2.0, patentGrant, explicit patent license from contributors]
-
A.
hasPatentGrant
chosen
Indicates that a patent grant exists conferring legal protection or rights to an entity for a specific invention or intellectual property.
-
B.
patent
Indicates that a legal protection has been granted to an entity for an invention, giving it exclusive rights to make, use, or sell that invention.
-
C.
patentIn
Indicates that one entity holds or is associated with a patent located, filed, or registered in a particular jurisdiction, organization, or context represented by the other entity.
-
D.
grantedRoyalPatentBy
Indicates that an entity has been formally given a royal patent by a specified royal authority or monarch.
-
E.
patentNumber
Indicates that a specific patent is identified or referenced by a particular patent number.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00857439c819095950754176aa58a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0400f1af881908d376ea4793f6dea |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c0334dc8248190b7394dcece362d52 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:22 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:58 p.m.