Triple
T5892221
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | P versus NP problem |
E131016
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedConcept |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cook–Levin theorem |
E512972
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cook–Levin theorem | Statement: [P versus NP problem, relatedConcept, Cook–Levin theorem]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cook–Levin theorem Context triple: [P versus NP problem, relatedConcept, Cook–Levin theorem]
-
A.
Cook–Levin theorem
chosen
The Cook–Levin theorem is a foundational result in computational complexity theory that established the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) as the first NP-complete problem, launching the theory of NP-completeness.
-
B.
Valiant–Vazirani theorem
The Valiant–Vazirani theorem is a fundamental result in computational complexity theory showing that solving unique solutions of NP problems is, under randomized reductions, as hard as solving general NP problems, with major implications for the study of randomness and hardness of approximation.
-
C.
PCP theorem
The PCP theorem is a fundamental result in computational complexity theory stating that every problem in NP has probabilistically checkable proofs that can be verified by examining only a constant number of bits, with major implications for the hardness of approximation.
-
D.
P versus NP problem
The P versus NP problem is a central unsolved question in theoretical computer science that asks whether every problem whose solution can be quickly verified by a computer can also be quickly solved by a computer.
-
E.
Entscheidungsproblem
The Entscheidungsproblem is a foundational decision problem in mathematical logic that asks whether there exists a general algorithm to determine the truth or falsity of any given first-order logical statement.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00857439c819095950754176aa58a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c036b45bec81908a13f39bbc181a59 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:36 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c0b14c2ff081908243988d5815be6d |
completed | March 23, 2026, 3:19 a.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:58 p.m.