Triple
T58882
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rogers Commission investigation of the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster |
E1166
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOfficialName |
P66
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident |
E1166
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident | Statement: [Rogers Commission investigation of the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster, hasOfficialName, Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident Context triple: [Rogers Commission investigation of the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster, hasOfficialName, Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident]
-
A.
Rogers Commission investigation of the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster
chosen
The Rogers Commission investigation of the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster was a presidentially appointed inquiry that probed the technical and organizational causes of the 1986 shuttle explosion, famously exposing flaws in NASA’s decision-making and safety culture.
-
B.
United States Senate Watergate Committee
The United States Senate Watergate Committee was a special investigative committee formed by the U.S. Senate in 1973 to publicly investigate the Watergate break-in and related abuses of power in the Nixon administration.
-
C.
Second Hoover Commission
The Second Hoover Commission was a bipartisan post–World War II body chaired by former President Herbert Hoover that recommended major reforms to streamline and modernize the organization and operations of the U.S. federal government.
-
D.
S-1 Uranium Committee
The S-1 Uranium Committee was a U.S. government scientific advisory group that coordinated early research into nuclear fission and atomic weapons, laying the groundwork for what became the Manhattan Project.
-
E.
Report Review Committee of the National Academies
The Report Review Committee of the National Academies is a body that oversees the independent, expert peer review of National Academies reports to ensure their quality, objectivity, and adherence to institutional standards.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOfficialName Context triple: [Rogers Commission investigation of the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster, hasOfficialName, Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident]
-
A.
officialName
chosen
Indicates the formally recognized name assigned to an entity by an authoritative body or source.
-
B.
officialNameInSpanish
Indicates the officially recognized name of an entity when expressed in the Spanish language.
-
C.
nameOf
Indicates that one entity is the name or designation of another entity.
-
D.
commonNameOf
Indicates that one entity is the commonly used or popular name by which the other entity is known.
-
E.
hasEndonym
Indicates that an entity has a name or designation used by native speakers or within its own local language or community.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24a552ef88190a0df287d68c65cba |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:52 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a250e401288190ba12322c9c5f07c9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:20 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a25ab7ec3881909356c659f4664fb8 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24e9f40908190a2f4a2111469b733 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:10 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:55 a.m.