Triple
T5876939
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | K9A2 |
E130648
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDevelopmentStatus |
P67385
|
FINISHED |
| Object | under development and testing in the 2020s |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: under development and testing in the 2020s | Statement: [K9A2, hasDevelopmentStatus, under development and testing in the 2020s]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDevelopmentStatus Context triple: [K9A2, hasDevelopmentStatus, under development and testing in the 2020s]
-
A.
hasDevelopmentType
Indicates the type or category of development associated with an entity, such as the nature, form, or stage of its development.
-
B.
hasDevelopmentSystem
Indicates that one entity possesses, uses, or is associated with a particular system, platform, or environment used for development activities.
-
C.
hasDevelopmentDimension
Indicates that something possesses or is associated with a particular aspect or dimension of development.
-
D.
hasDevelopmentOrganization
Indicates that an entity is associated with, managed by, or supported by a specific organization responsible for its development.
-
E.
developedThrough
Indicates that something came into existence, was created, or was brought to its current form by means of a specified process, method, or developmental pathway.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0085523688190bfd487479ce819e6 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0432fea5881909f5c291dd8db6105 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c033499ca08190bd26cee5b03f6306 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:22 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c0432f06fc8190bc047d52ffc30d59 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:57 p.m.