Triple
T5855967
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rytro |
E130152
|
entity |
| Predicate | isPartOf |
P10
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Rytro |
E550976
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Rytro | Statement: [Rytro, isPartOf, Gmina Rytro]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Rytro Context triple: [Rytro, isPartOf, Gmina Rytro]
-
A.
Gmina Rytro
chosen
Gmina Rytro is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, situated in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship and known for its mountainous landscapes in the Beskid Sądecki range.
-
B.
Gmina Trzebinia
Gmina Trzebinia is an urban-rural administrative district in southern Poland, located in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship.
-
C.
Gmina Gubin
Gmina Gubin is a rural administrative district in western Poland, situated in Lubusz Voivodeship near the German border.
-
D.
Gmina Morąg
Gmina Morąg is an urban-rural administrative district in northern Poland’s Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship, centered on the town of Morąg.
-
E.
Gmina Bielawy
Gmina Bielawy is a rural administrative district in central Poland, known for encompassing several villages and agricultural areas.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0084de39081909eb34e6bed74215a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c03555cd6081908b0307decd60d2bc |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c0b105fb588190ac58a94513df6682 |
completed | March 23, 2026, 3:18 a.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:55 p.m.