Triple
T5839298
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | theosis |
E129551
|
entity |
| Predicate | basedOnScripture |
P2326
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2 Peter 1:4 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2 Peter 1:4 | Statement: [theosis, basedOnScripture, 2 Peter 1:4]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: basedOnScripture Context triple: [theosis, basedOnScripture, 2 Peter 1:4]
-
A.
scripturalBasis
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the religious or scriptural foundation, support, or justification for another entity (such as a belief, practice, or doctrine).
-
B.
hasScripture
Indicates that one entity possesses, is associated with, or is defined by a particular scripture or set of scriptural texts.
-
C.
inScripture
Indicates that something is mentioned, described, or referenced within a scriptural or sacred text.
-
D.
scripturalExpertise
Indicates a relationship where one entity possesses specialized knowledge or authoritative understanding of religious scriptures in relation to another entity or context.
-
E.
hasViewOnScripture
Indicates that an entity holds a particular interpretive stance or doctrinal position regarding scripture.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0084af79c81908af128ccc29983d0 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c044ab0a048190b84be40fb13c0f50 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c03341e5888190a5f219b6f92cb161 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:54 p.m.