Triple
T5831100
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Elvis Ramone |
E129347
|
entity |
| Predicate | inspiredByNamingConvention |
P2555
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ramones family-name style |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ramones family-name style | Statement: [Elvis Ramone, inspiredByNamingConvention, Ramones family-name style]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inspiredByNamingConvention Context triple: [Elvis Ramone, inspiredByNamingConvention, Ramones family-name style]
-
A.
namingConventionType
Indicates the specific style or set of rules used for naming entities or elements in a given context.
-
B.
namingStructure
chosen
Indicates a relationship where one entity defines, organizes, or constrains the naming or label format used for another entity.
-
C.
namedAs
Indicates that one entity is given, known by, or referred to using the name of another entity.
-
D.
logicConvention
Indicates a relationship where entities participate in or are associated with a convention, event, or standard related to logic or logical systems.
-
E.
coNamedWith
Indicates that two or more entities share the same name or are designated by an identical label.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00849d55481908b4f9f5543e0bf6d |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c044ab0a048190b84be40fb13c0f50 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c03341e5888190a5f219b6f92cb161 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:54 p.m.