Triple

T582048
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Slavic languages E15078 entity
Predicate typologically P5201 FINISHED
Object fusional languages LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fusional languages | Statement: [Slavic languages, typologically, fusional languages]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typologically
Context triple: [Slavic languages, typologically, fusional languages]
  • A. typology
    Indicates a classification relationship in which entities are grouped or organized according to shared types, patterns, or structural characteristics.
  • B. linguisticType
    Indicates the type or category of language or linguistic system associated with an entity (e.g., spoken, signed, written, or other linguistic modality).
  • C. hasLinguisticTypology chosen
    Indicates a relationship where a language or linguistic system is characterized by a specific typological classification or structural type.
  • D. linguisticFeature
    Indicates a relationship where a linguistic property, pattern, or characteristic is attributed to or associated with a language-related entity (such as a word, phrase, or text).
  • E. grammaticalType
    Indicates the grammatical category or role (such as part of speech or syntactic function) that an expression has within a language.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4935783b8819082b77726ec10cc42 completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49b84899881909d5b2b4e67e22d9b completed March 1, 2026, 8:03 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a494c7f9008190bd8d05b4dc2a7c7f completed March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m.