Triple
T58138
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Guaranteed Rate Field |
E1150
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRenovation |
P3322
|
FINISHED |
| Object | early 2000s renovation program |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: early 2000s renovation program | Statement: [Guaranteed Rate Field, hasRenovation, early 2000s renovation program]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRenovation Context triple: [Guaranteed Rate Field, hasRenovation, early 2000s renovation program]
-
A.
renovationCompleted
Indicates that a renovation process for an entity has been fully finished and is no longer in progress.
-
B.
renovatedBy
Indicates that an entity has been improved, restored, or updated through renovation work performed by another entity.
-
C.
constructionCompleted
Indicates that a construction process or project has been fully finished and reached its completed state.
-
D.
rebuiltFor
Indicates that one entity has been reconstructed, renovated, or modified specifically to serve the needs, purposes, or use of another entity.
-
E.
house
Indicates that one entity serves as a dwelling or residence for another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a248adc5b48190aa8db9fb092fb28a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:45 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24c9057348190aa6692eeeae19569 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ac7547c81909bb68f327cdb9158 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a24c8fa20c8190aacc38e53d1f654c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:50 a.m.