Triple
T5800699
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | DDR Standing Capacity |
E128613
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsContext |
P59153
|
FINISHED |
| Object | conflict settings |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: conflict settings | Statement: [DDR Standing Capacity, supportsContext, conflict settings]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsContext Context triple: [DDR Standing Capacity, supportsContext, conflict settings]
-
A.
requiresContext
Indicates that the relationship or action cannot be properly understood or evaluated without additional surrounding information, conditions, or circumstances.
-
B.
supportedIn
Indicates that one entity is valid, applicable, or functionally enabled within the context, environment, platform, or scope defined by another entity.
-
C.
supportedAs
Indicates that one entity is accepted, recognized, or treated as being in the role, type, or representation of another entity.
-
D.
supportsUse
Indicates that one entity enables, allows, or is compatible with the use or operation of another entity.
-
E.
supplyContext
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides relevant background information or situational details that clarify or frame another entity, action, or statement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00846a0d881909e46841f8e156b64 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c02b1304588190b59a18fb7b70a60f |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021d477008190946113f9859eeb90 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:52 p.m.