Triple

T579887
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Finnish government E15032 entity
Predicate accountableFor P636 FINISHED
Object state governance LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: state governance | Statement: [Finnish government, accountableFor, state governance]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: accountableFor
Context triple: [Finnish government, accountableFor, state governance]
  • A. responsibleFor chosen
    Indicates that one entity has a duty, obligation, or role to manage, oversee, or be accountable for another entity or outcome.
  • B. establishesLiabilityFor
    Indicates that one party is held legally responsible or accountable for a particular act, omission, or outcome.
  • C. appointedFor
    Indicates that an entity has been officially assigned or designated to perform a specific role, task, or function for another entity or purpose.
  • D. assignedUnder
    Indicates that one entity has been given responsibility, duty, or authority to act within the scope, supervision, or framework defined by another entity.
  • E. actsOnBehalfOf
    Indicates that one entity performs actions or makes decisions as a representative or proxy for another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4935783b8819082b77726ec10cc42 completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49b82b5248190ac863407e8207a3b completed March 1, 2026, 8:03 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a494c7f9008190bd8d05b4dc2a7c7f completed March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m.