Triple

T5794827
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tshimanda E128482 entity
Predicate relatedDialectOf P10003 FINISHED
Object Venda language LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Venda language | Statement: [Tshimanda, relatedDialectOf, Venda language]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatedDialectOf
Context triple: [Tshimanda, relatedDialectOf, Venda language]
  • A. majorDialectOf
    Indicates that one dialect is the primary or most prominent dialect associated with a particular language or region.
  • B. hasDialectContinuumWith
    Indicates that two languages or dialects are part of a continuous chain of mutually intelligible varieties, without a clear boundary separating them.
  • C. notableDialect
    Indicates that an entity is recognized for having a distinct or noteworthy dialect associated with it.
  • D. linguisticallyRelatedTo chosen
    Indicates that two entities are connected through a linguistic relationship, such as sharing a common language, origin, structure, or other language-based association.
  • E. focusesOnDialect
    Indicates that the subject’s attention, work, or activity is specifically directed toward a particular dialect or set of dialects.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c00845ca68819081a2ce3ecca577f7 completed March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c02b1304588190b59a18fb7b70a60f completed March 22, 2026, 5:46 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c021d477008190946113f9859eeb90 completed March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:51 p.m.