Triple

T5772560
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject FASB Accounting Standards Codification E127361 entity
Predicate becameAuthoritativeOn P66349 FINISHED
Object 2009-07-01 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2009-07-01 | Statement: [FASB Accounting Standards Codification, becameAuthoritativeOn, 2009-07-01]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: becameAuthoritativeOn
Context triple: [FASB Accounting Standards Codification, becameAuthoritativeOn, 2009-07-01]
  • A. authoritativeFor
    Indicates that one entity has recognized control, responsibility, or decision-making power over another entity or domain.
  • B. succeededAsMajorityLeaderBy
    Indicates that one individual ceased serving as majority leader and was directly followed in that role by another individual.
  • C. reaffirmsAuthorityOf
    Indicates that one entity confirms, strengthens, or restates the legitimacy or power of another entity’s authority.
  • D. succeededByAuthorityType
    Indicates that one authority type is directly followed or replaced by another authority type in a sequence or hierarchy.
  • E. indicatesAuthorityOver
    Indicates that one entity holds recognized power, control, or decision-making authority over another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c00834f6308190851b0abeddd8ed7e completed March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c02acb12c081908e4beee4a957f9f9 completed March 22, 2026, 5:45 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c021d0c6088190ba670ddcdbf5ca3e completed March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c02ac9603481909e3fa295d7904a15 completed March 22, 2026, 5:45 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:50 p.m.