Triple

T5767929
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject CIE standard illuminant D65 E127258 entity
Predicate hasRelativeTristimulusY P55247 FINISHED
Object 1.00000 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1.00000 | Statement: [CIE standard illuminant D65, hasRelativeTristimulusY, 1.00000]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRelativeTristimulusY
Context triple: [CIE standard illuminant D65, hasRelativeTristimulusY, 1.00000]
  • A. relativeLuminance chosen
    Indicates the measured brightness of one entity relative to a reference or to other entities in the same context.
  • B. hasRGB
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a specific RGB (red, green, blue) color value.
  • C. colorGamutRelative
    Indicates that one color gamut is defined, measured, or evaluated in relation to another reference gamut rather than in absolute terms.
  • D. greenPrimary_y
    Indicates that the referenced entity serves as the primary or dominant green component in a color representation or relationship.
  • E. hasComplementaryColor
    Indicates that one color is the complementary (i.e., opposite on the color wheel, providing maximum contrast) counterpart of another color.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c00834f6308190851b0abeddd8ed7e completed March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c02acb12c081908e4beee4a957f9f9 completed March 22, 2026, 5:45 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c021ce8d3c81909b332cb1c33a61ad completed March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:49 p.m.