Triple
T576725
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear |
E13772
|
entity |
| Predicate | powerOptimizationFor |
P15693
|
FINISHED |
| Object | small batteries |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: small batteries | Statement: [Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear, powerOptimizationFor, small batteries]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: powerOptimizationFor Context triple: [Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear, powerOptimizationFor, small batteries]
-
A.
powerBy
Indicates that one entity operates, functions, or is made possible through the energy, resources, or enabling capabilities provided by another entity.
-
B.
inPower
Indicates that one entity currently holds governing authority, control, or leadership over a group, organization, or domain.
-
C.
powerDependsOn
Indicates that the power or effectiveness of one entity is contingent upon, or influenced by, another entity.
-
D.
powerDirection
Indicates the direction in which power, influence, or control flows from one entity to another.
-
E.
reducedPowerOf
Indicates that one entity has a diminished or weakened level of power, authority, or effectiveness relative to another or to its previous state.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4933fa4d88190a7949cc83c08c5c1 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a49b68cc808190b1ba45bdad78443d |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a494c692288190b88f30299516b5ba |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4985a2d08819090947895d9439e06 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m.