Triple

T5738334
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Article 368 E126553 entity
Predicate subjectOf P38 FINISHED
Object Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India E126554 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India | Statement: [Article 368, subjectOf, Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India
Context triple: [Article 368, subjectOf, Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India]
  • A. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala chosen
    Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala is a landmark 1973 Supreme Court of India judgment that established the basic structure doctrine, limiting Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
  • B. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India
    Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India is a landmark 2018 Supreme Court of India judgment that decriminalized consensual same-sex relations by reading down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code and affirming constitutional protections for LGBTQ+ rights.
  • C. Joseph Shine v. Union of India
    Joseph Shine v. Union of India is a landmark 2018 Supreme Court of India judgment that decriminalized adultery by striking down Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code as unconstitutional and discriminatory.
  • D. Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India
    Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India is a landmark Supreme Court of India case that examined environmental, displacement, and development issues surrounding large dam construction on the Narmada River.
  • E. Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India
    Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India is a landmark 2017 Supreme Court of India judgment that unanimously affirmed the fundamental right to privacy under the Indian Constitution.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0083082288190b7478cead6b5430a completed March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c0255c8c308190821f968ec41c5078 completed March 22, 2026, 5:22 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c07e10e4d08190bfb8162d53cfb443 completed March 22, 2026, 11:41 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:47 p.m.