Triple
T5738333
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Article 368 |
E126553
|
entity |
| Predicate | subjectOf |
P38
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala |
E126554
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala | Statement: [Article 368, subjectOf, Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala Context triple: [Article 368, subjectOf, Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala]
-
A.
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
chosen
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala is a landmark 1973 Supreme Court of India judgment that established the basic structure doctrine, limiting Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
-
B.
Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India
Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India is a landmark 2017 Supreme Court of India judgment that unanimously affirmed the fundamental right to privacy under the Indian Constitution.
-
C.
Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India
Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India is a landmark Supreme Court of India case that examined environmental, displacement, and development issues surrounding large dam construction on the Narmada River.
-
D.
INS v. Chadha
INS v. Chadha is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional, significantly reshaping the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
-
E.
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India is a landmark 2018 Supreme Court of India judgment that decriminalized consensual same-sex relations by reading down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code and affirming constitutional protections for LGBTQ+ rights.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0083082288190b7478cead6b5430a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0255c8c308190821f968ec41c5078 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c07e10e4d08190bfb8162d53cfb443 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 11:41 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:47 p.m.