Triple
T5721656
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Baker v. Carr |
E126158
|
entity |
| Predicate | plaintiffsClaim |
P4932
|
FINISHED |
| Object | malapportionment of Tennessee legislative districts diluted urban voters' votes in violation of the Equal Protection Clause |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: malapportionment of Tennessee legislative districts diluted urban voters' votes in violation of the Equal Protection Clause | Statement: [Baker v. Carr, plaintiffsClaim, malapportionment of Tennessee legislative districts diluted urban voters' votes in violation of the Equal Protection Clause]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: plaintiffsClaim Context triple: [Baker v. Carr, plaintiffsClaim, malapportionment of Tennessee legislative districts diluted urban voters' votes in violation of the Equal Protection Clause]
-
A.
typeOfClaim
Indicates the specific category or nature of a claim being made in relation to an entity or statement.
-
B.
mainClaim
chosen
Indicates that one statement is presented as the central or primary assertion being made about a topic.
-
C.
claimsToBe
Indicates that one entity asserts or declares itself to have a particular identity, role, or property, regardless of whether this assertion is true.
-
D.
lostClaimTo
Indicates that one entity previously held a right or ownership over something but no longer retains that claim, often due to transfer, forfeiture, or invalidation.
-
E.
modalClaim
Indicates that the statement is being made with a modal qualification, such as possibility, necessity, or obligation, rather than as an unqualified factual claim.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0082e3d548190950169847b43043b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c029014588819094a2a0f6f9b66bab |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021c47f4c81909e6849c3be3e951c |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:46 p.m.