Triple
T5721619
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Baker v. Carr |
E126158
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullCaseName |
P3131
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe C. Carr, Secretary of State of Tennessee, et al.
Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe C. Carr, Secretary of State of Tennessee, et al. is the landmark 1962 U.S. Supreme Court case that established federal courts’ authority to hear legislative redistricting challenges under the Equal Protection Clause, paving the way for the “one person, one vote” principle.
|
E541340
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe C. Carr, Secretary of State of Tennessee, et al. | Statement: [Baker v. Carr, fullCaseName, Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe C. Carr, Secretary of State of Tennessee, et al.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe C. Carr, Secretary of State of Tennessee, et al. Context triple: [Baker v. Carr, fullCaseName, Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe C. Carr, Secretary of State of Tennessee, et al.]
-
A.
Baker v. Nelson
Baker v. Nelson was a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that summarily dismissed a same-sex marriage claim, effectively allowing states to ban such marriages until it was later overturned by Obergefell v. Hodges.
-
B.
State of Tennessee v. Lemaricus Davidson et al.
State of Tennessee v. Lemaricus Davidson et al. is the criminal case arising from the 2007 kidnapping, rape, torture, and murder of Knoxville couple Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom.
-
C.
State of Tennessee v. Letalvis Cobbins
State of Tennessee v. Letalvis Cobbins is a criminal case arising from the 2007 kidnapping, rape, and murder of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom in Knoxville, Tennessee, which led to multiple high-profile prosecutions.
-
D.
State of Tennessee v. George Thomas
State of Tennessee v. George Thomas is a criminal case arising from the highly publicized 2007 torture and murder of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom in Knoxville, Tennessee.
-
E.
Carter v. Carter Coal Co.
Carter v. Carter Coal Co. was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down federal regulation of coal production as an unconstitutional overreach of Congress’s Commerce Clause powers.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe C. Carr, Secretary of State of Tennessee, et al. Triple: [Baker v. Carr, fullCaseName, Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe C. Carr, Secretary of State of Tennessee, et al.]
Generated description
Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe C. Carr, Secretary of State of Tennessee, et al. is the landmark 1962 U.S. Supreme Court case that established federal courts’ authority to hear legislative redistricting challenges under the Equal Protection Clause, paving the way for the “one person, one vote” principle.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe C. Carr, Secretary of State of Tennessee, et al. Target entity description: Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe C. Carr, Secretary of State of Tennessee, et al. is the landmark 1962 U.S. Supreme Court case that established federal courts’ authority to hear legislative redistricting challenges under the Equal Protection Clause, paving the way for the “one person, one vote” principle.
-
A.
Baker v. Nelson
Baker v. Nelson was a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that summarily dismissed a same-sex marriage claim, effectively allowing states to ban such marriages until it was later overturned by Obergefell v. Hodges.
-
B.
State of Tennessee v. Lemaricus Davidson et al.
State of Tennessee v. Lemaricus Davidson et al. is the criminal case arising from the 2007 kidnapping, rape, torture, and murder of Knoxville couple Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom.
-
C.
State of Tennessee v. Letalvis Cobbins
State of Tennessee v. Letalvis Cobbins is a criminal case arising from the 2007 kidnapping, rape, and murder of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom in Knoxville, Tennessee, which led to multiple high-profile prosecutions.
-
D.
State of Tennessee v. George Thomas
State of Tennessee v. George Thomas is a criminal case arising from the highly publicized 2007 torture and murder of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom in Knoxville, Tennessee.
-
E.
Carter v. Carter Coal Co.
Carter v. Carter Coal Co. was a 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down federal regulation of coal production as an unconstitutional overreach of Congress’s Commerce Clause powers.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0082e3d548190950169847b43043b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c024e5697081908096b42b3d71c9a7 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:20 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c05a80aefc8190b6ea35ab405ea502 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:09 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69c05c7663388190ab491144149532a4 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:17 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69c05d2ef9488190ac0111cb6a94b1d0 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:46 p.m.