Triple
T568848
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Mind of Primitive Man |
E13616
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasInfluentialConcept |
P9507
|
FINISHED |
| Object | historical particularism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: historical particularism | Statement: [The Mind of Primitive Man, hasInfluentialConcept, historical particularism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInfluentialConcept Context triple: [The Mind of Primitive Man, hasInfluentialConcept, historical particularism]
-
A.
hasConcept
Indicates that an entity includes, embodies, or is associated with a particular concept.
-
B.
hasCulturalConcept
chosen
Indicates that an entity embodies, includes, or is associated with a particular cultural idea, value, practice, or construct.
-
C.
hasHistoricalInfluenceFrom
Indicates that one entity’s characteristics, development, or significance have been shaped or affected by the past actions, ideas, or legacy of another entity.
-
D.
influencedDiscussionOf
Indicates that one entity had an effect on the way another entity was discussed, framed, or debated.
-
E.
introducedConcept
Indicates that one entity is responsible for presenting, defining, or bringing a new concept into use or awareness for another entity or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4933fa4d88190a7949cc83c08c5c1 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a49b0406d481908af5fc7bc67103fb |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a494c2caac819086ab316fa49d324c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m.