Triple
T5678428
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Public Law 79-585 |
E125141
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalCitationNumber |
P65929
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 79-585 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 79-585 | Statement: [Public Law 79-585, legalCitationNumber, 79-585]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalCitationNumber Context triple: [Public Law 79-585, legalCitationNumber, 79-585]
-
A.
legalCitation
Indicates that one legal document, case, or authority formally references or cites another as a source of legal support or precedent.
-
B.
legalCitationSystem
Indicates a system or convention used to reference and identify legal authorities such as cases, statutes, or regulations.
-
C.
legalCitationType
Indicates the specific kind or category of legal citation that characterizes the relationship between the citing and cited legal sources.
-
D.
legalCitationForm
Indicates the standardized way in which a legal authority (such as a case, statute, or regulation) should be cited in legal documents.
-
E.
formerLegalCitation
Indicates that one legal citation previously referred to or governed a matter but has since been replaced, superseded, or is no longer the current controlling citation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008295c808190acfe78915e7d656a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c025303860819093e51f176babed71 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021bc3894819084f37d14ba4b2644 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c0252e18988190a8f3aa0684c12fb8 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:44 p.m.