Triple

T567307
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Article XXI (Security Exceptions) E13582 entity
Predicate debate P8604 FINISHED
Object scope of members’ discretion in invoking security exceptions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: scope of members’ discretion in invoking security exceptions | Statement: [Article XXI (Security Exceptions), debate, scope of members’ discretion in invoking security exceptions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: debate
Context triple: [Article XXI (Security Exceptions), debate, scope of members’ discretion in invoking security exceptions]
  • A. hasDebate chosen
    Indicates that there is a formal discussion or argument between entities, typically presenting opposing viewpoints on a topic.
  • B. languageOfDebate
    Indicates that a specified language is the one used for conducting a particular debate.
  • C. controversy
    Indicates a situation in which there is active disagreement, dispute, or public debate between parties over a particular issue, action, or claim.
  • D. hasLongTermDebateOn
    Indicates that there is an ongoing, extended period of discussion, disagreement, or argument concerning a particular topic or issue.
  • E. discourse
    Indicates that one entity engages in extended verbal or written communication or discussion with another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4933edcf08190b35ecfd6014caee6 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49b02da148190b6a9bad3a22d8ec5 completed March 1, 2026, 8:01 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a494c183b081909304944aa3d0fe8f completed March 1, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m.