Triple

T5633284
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gussie Fink-Nottle E147883 entity
Predicate oftenInvolvedIn P23735 FINISHED
Object romantic entanglements LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: romantic entanglements | Statement: [Gussie Fink-Nottle, oftenInvolvedIn, romantic entanglements]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: oftenInvolvedIn
Context triple: [Gussie Fink-Nottle, oftenInvolvedIn, romantic entanglements]
  • A. oftenInvolvedWith chosen
    Indicates that one entity frequently participates in or is commonly associated with activities, events, or situations involving another entity.
  • B. constantInvolved
    Indicates that a constant participates in or is directly involved in the specified relation, operation, or context.
  • C. formerlyInvolved
    Indicates that an entity previously participated in or was associated with another entity or activity, but is no longer involved.
  • D. stillInvolvedIn
    Indicates that an entity continues to participate in or be associated with a particular activity, role, or relationship at the present time.
  • E. hasPeopleInvolved
    Indicates that certain people participate in, are associated with, or are otherwise involved in the referenced entity or event.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c00907bc8881909ed760d3ed73ef35 completed March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c0225ff3248190b93c9f5887553fd4 completed March 22, 2026, 5:09 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c01b1f12ec8190b4b9d9ee31cabe19 completed March 22, 2026, 4:38 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:41 p.m.