Triple
T5631741
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rhynie Chert fossil locality |
E147848
|
entity |
| Predicate | preservationQuality |
P9592
|
FINISHED |
| Object | exceptional |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: exceptional | Statement: [Rhynie Chert fossil locality, preservationQuality, exceptional]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: preservationQuality Context triple: [Rhynie Chert fossil locality, preservationQuality, exceptional]
-
A.
preservationFactor
Indicates the degree to which something is protected, maintained, or kept intact over time, often moderating how much change, loss, or degradation occurs.
-
B.
stateOfPreservation
chosen
Indicates the condition or degree to which something has been maintained, conserved, or kept intact over time.
-
C.
preservationType
Indicates the method or process by which something is preserved or kept from deterioration.
-
D.
storageQuality
Indicates the degree or standard of how well something is stored, such as its preservation, safety, or suitability for use.
-
E.
preservationMethod
Indicates the technique or process used to maintain, protect, or prolong the condition, quality, or usability of something over time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00907bc8881909ed760d3ed73ef35 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0225e8e848190a9ccd48fc0d74e5c |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c01b1f12ec8190b4b9d9ee31cabe19 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 4:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:40 p.m.