Triple
T5615533
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kayanic languages |
E147467
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMember |
P10
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Uma’ Pawe language
The Uma’ Pawe language is an Austronesian language of the Kayanic subgroup spoken by an indigenous community in Borneo.
|
E534744
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Uma’ Pawe language | Statement: [Kayanic languages, hasMember, Uma’ Pawe language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Uma’ Pawe language Context triple: [Kayanic languages, hasMember, Uma’ Pawe language]
-
A.
Puyuma language
The Puyuma language is an endangered Austronesian language spoken by the Puyuma Indigenous people of southeastern Taiwan.
-
B.
Opokuma language
The Opokuma language is a Niger-Congo language spoken by the Opokuma subgroup of the Ijaw people in Nigeria’s Niger Delta region.
-
C.
Keapara language
The Keapara language is an Austronesian language of coastal Papua New Guinea spoken by the Keapara people in Central Province.
-
D.
Kapingamarangi language
The Kapingamarangi language is a Polynesian outlier language spoken primarily on Kapingamarangi Atoll in the Federated States of Micronesia.
-
E.
Opata language
The Opata language is an extinct Uto-Aztecan language once spoken by the Opata people of northern Mexico, particularly in the present-day state of Sonora.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Uma’ Pawe language Triple: [Kayanic languages, hasMember, Uma’ Pawe language]
Generated description
The Uma’ Pawe language is an Austronesian language of the Kayanic subgroup spoken by an indigenous community in Borneo.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Uma’ Pawe language Target entity description: The Uma’ Pawe language is an Austronesian language of the Kayanic subgroup spoken by an indigenous community in Borneo.
-
A.
Puyuma language
The Puyuma language is an endangered Austronesian language spoken by the Puyuma Indigenous people of southeastern Taiwan.
-
B.
Opokuma language
The Opokuma language is a Niger-Congo language spoken by the Opokuma subgroup of the Ijaw people in Nigeria’s Niger Delta region.
-
C.
Keapara language
The Keapara language is an Austronesian language of coastal Papua New Guinea spoken by the Keapara people in Central Province.
-
D.
Kapingamarangi language
The Kapingamarangi language is a Polynesian outlier language spoken primarily on Kapingamarangi Atoll in the Federated States of Micronesia.
-
E.
Opata language
The Opata language is an extinct Uto-Aztecan language once spoken by the Opata people of northern Mexico, particularly in the present-day state of Sonora.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00905d4588190bd967842bbcf2219 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c021d8d600819097df4e265e262d90 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c04d51c12c8190911fb9a0c0d234d8 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69c04e89b7c481908abae227d22cc814 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:18 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69c04f41b158819097f9ef536215e248 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:39 p.m.