Triple
T5615532
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kayanic languages |
E147467
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMember |
P10
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Uma’ Lasan language
The Uma’ Lasan language is an Austronesian language of the Kayanic subgroup spoken by an indigenous community in Borneo.
|
E534743
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Uma’ Lasan language | Statement: [Kayanic languages, hasMember, Uma’ Lasan language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Uma’ Lasan language Context triple: [Kayanic languages, hasMember, Uma’ Lasan language]
-
A.
Lasalimu language
The Lasalimu language is an Austronesian language spoken by a small community on Buton Island in Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia.
-
B.
Uma language
Uma is an Austronesian language of the Celebic subgroup spoken primarily in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia.
-
C.
Lakalai language
The Lakalai language is an Austronesian language spoken by the Lakalai people of New Britain in Papua New Guinea.
-
D.
Blablanga language
The Blablanga language is an Oceanic language spoken in the Solomon Islands, belonging to the Northwest Solomonic subgroup of the Austronesian language family.
-
E.
Nomlaki language
The Nomlaki language is an endangered Native American language traditionally spoken by the Nomlaki people of northern California.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Uma’ Lasan language Triple: [Kayanic languages, hasMember, Uma’ Lasan language]
Generated description
The Uma’ Lasan language is an Austronesian language of the Kayanic subgroup spoken by an indigenous community in Borneo.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Uma’ Lasan language Target entity description: The Uma’ Lasan language is an Austronesian language of the Kayanic subgroup spoken by an indigenous community in Borneo.
-
A.
Lasalimu language
The Lasalimu language is an Austronesian language spoken by a small community on Buton Island in Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia.
-
B.
Uma language
Uma is an Austronesian language of the Celebic subgroup spoken primarily in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia.
-
C.
Lakalai language
The Lakalai language is an Austronesian language spoken by the Lakalai people of New Britain in Papua New Guinea.
-
D.
Blablanga language
The Blablanga language is an Oceanic language spoken in the Solomon Islands, belonging to the Northwest Solomonic subgroup of the Austronesian language family.
-
E.
Nomlaki language
The Nomlaki language is an endangered Native American language traditionally spoken by the Nomlaki people of northern California.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00905d4588190bd967842bbcf2219 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c021d8d600819097df4e265e262d90 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c04d51c12c8190911fb9a0c0d234d8 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69c04e89b7c481908abae227d22cc814 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:18 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69c04f41b158819097f9ef536215e248 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:21 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:39 p.m.