Triple

T5610001
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dennis v. United States E147329 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Brandenburg v. Ohio E33569 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Brandenburg v. Ohio | Statement: [Dennis v. United States, relatedCase, Brandenburg v. Ohio]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Brandenburg v. Ohio
Context triple: [Dennis v. United States, relatedCase, Brandenburg v. Ohio]
  • A. Brandenburg v. Ohio chosen
    Brandenburg v. Ohio is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly strengthened free speech protections by establishing the "imminent lawless action" test for when advocacy of violence can be punished under the First Amendment.
  • B. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
    Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire is a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "fighting words" doctrine, holding that certain personally abusive epithets are not protected by the First Amendment.
  • C. Mapp v. Ohio
    Mapp v. Ohio is a landmark 1961 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied the exclusionary rule to the states, holding that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in state criminal prosecutions.
  • D. Terry v. Ohio
    Terry v. Ohio is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the legality of police "stop and frisk" searches based on reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause.
  • E. Cohens v. Virginia
    Cohens v. Virginia is an 1821 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed the Court’s authority to review state criminal proceedings involving federal law, strengthening federal judicial power over the states.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0090500f881908374285baf0ac46f completed March 22, 2026, 3:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c0211dfc88819097b6d4254a61f65a completed March 22, 2026, 5:04 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c04d4876208190b8f5b5ab2ba762d8 completed March 22, 2026, 8:12 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:39 p.m.